Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Key threats to gibbons are logging and hunting. | * Key threats to gibbons are logging and hunting. | ||
* Conservation activities have focused on biomonitoring and patrolling the area. | * Conservation activities have focused on biomonitoring and patrolling the area. | ||
| Line 67: | Line 63: | ||
|0.53 | |0.53 | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
|4 | |4.0 | ||
|Southern Rakhine Yoma | |Southern Rakhine Yoma | ||
|Fixed point triangulation | |Fixed point triangulation | ||
|Geissmann et al. 2009 | |[[#R01528|Geissmann et al. 2009]] | ||
|The survey area was located in a small mountain ridge facing the Bay of Bengal adjacent to Taing Kyo village and, further inland, Chaung Tha village in Thandwe district, Gwa township in Rakhine division. | |The survey area was located in a small mountain ridge facing the Bay of Bengal adjacent to Taing Kyo village and, further inland, Chaung Tha village in Thandwe district, Gwa township in Rakhine division. | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 92: | Line 88: | ||
|11.4 Storms & flooding | |11.4 Storms & flooding | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|A cyclone in 2005 caused a lot of destruction of the forest in the site (Geissmann et al. 2009). | |A cyclone in 2005 caused a lot of destruction of the forest in the site ([[#R01528|Geissmann et al. 2009]]). | ||
|2005 | |2005 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 98: | Line 94: | ||
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
|Present (unknown severity) | |Present (unknown severity) | ||
|Cultivation of rice and other agricultural cash crops and subsistence crops encroaching the site due to lack of demarcation (Geissmann et al. 2009). | |Cultivation of rice and other agricultural cash crops and subsistence crops encroaching the site due to lack of demarcation ([[#R01528|Geissmann et al. 2009]]). | ||
|2008-Ongoing (2023) | |2008-Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 104: | Line 100: | ||
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
|Present (unknown severity) | |Present (unknown severity) | ||
|Hunting targeting mainly wild pigs and red muntjacs, but other wildlife get trapped in snares (Geissmann et al. 2009). | |Hunting targeting mainly wild pigs and red muntjacs, but other wildlife get trapped in snares ([[#R01528|Geissmann et al. 2009]]). | ||
|2008-Ongoing (2023) | |2008-Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 110: | Line 106: | ||
|5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | |5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | ||
|Present (unknown severity) | |Present (unknown severity) | ||
|Extraction of NTFPs such as bamboo for construction and medicinal plants (Geissmann et al. 2009). | |Extraction of NTFPs such as bamboo for construction and medicinal plants ([[#R01528|Geissmann et al. 2009]]). | ||
|2009-Ongoing (2023) | |2009-Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 116: | Line 112: | ||
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|Timber extraction for income and fuelwood (Geissmann et al. 2009). | |Timber extraction for income and fuelwood ([[#R01528|Geissmann et al. 2009]]). | ||
|2009-Ongoing (2023) | |2009-Ongoing (2023) | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 133: | Line 129: | ||
!Implementing organization(s) | !Implementing organization(s) | ||
!Year of activity | !Year of activity | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 Counter-wildlife crime | |2 Counter-wildlife crime | ||
| Line 151: | Line 141: | ||
| | | | ||
|2021-Ongoing (2023) | |2021-Ongoing (2023) | ||
|- | |||
|5 Protection & restoration | |||
|5.2 Legally protect ape habitat | |||
|The site has been a protected area since 2002. | |||
| | |||
|2002-Ongoing (2023) | |||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 166: | Line 162: | ||
!Year(s) | !Year(s) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |2 Resources and capacity | ||
| | |2.3 General lack of funding | ||
|Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023 | |Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023 | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |4 Institutional support | ||
| | |4.1 Lack of law enforcement | ||
|Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023 | |Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023 | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 269: | Line 265: | ||
= References = | = References = | ||
Geissmann, T., Grindley, M., Momberg, F., Lwin, N., & Moses, S. (2009). Hoolock gibbon and biodiversity survey and training in southern Rakhine Yoma, Myanmar. Gibbon Journal, (5), 7-27. | <span id="R01528"></span>Geissmann, T., Grindley, M., Momberg, F., Lwin, N., & Moses, S. (2009). Hoolock gibbon and biodiversity survey and training in southern Rakhine Yoma, Myanmar. Gibbon Journal, (5), 7-27. [http://www.gibbons.de/main/papers/pdf_files/2009rakhine-yoma.pdf link] | ||
'''Page created by: '''Naw May Lay Thant & APES Atlas Team''' Date:''' 2023-11-10 | '''Page created by: '''Naw May Lay Thant & APES Atlas Team''' Date:''' 2023-11-10 | ||
Latest revision as of 15:12, 14 October 2026
Asia > Myanmar > Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Western Hoolock Gibbons (Hoolock hoolock) are present in the Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range.
- The total population size is unknown.
- The population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 1755 km².
- Key threats to gibbons are logging and hunting.
- Conservation activities have focused on biomonitoring and patrolling the area.
Site characteristics
The site is located in western Myanmar (Burma), inland of the Bay of Bengal.
Table 1. Basic site information for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Species | Hoolock hoolock |
| Area | 1,755 km² |
| Coordinates | Lat: 17.623991 , Lon: 94.840521 |
| Type of site | Protected area (Wildlife Sanctuary) |
| Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical moist montane forest, Agricultural land, Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest |
| Type of governance |
Types of sites Governance types Habitat types
Ape status
The current population status is unknown, but gibbons are present based on community and survey team information (Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Species | Year | Total number groups (95% CI) | Density [groups/km²] (95% CI) | Total number indiv. (95% CI) | Area | Method | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoolock hoolock | 2008 | 0.53 | 1 | 4.0 | Southern Rakhine Yoma | Fixed point triangulation | Geissmann et al. 2009 | The survey area was located in a small mountain ridge facing the Bay of Bengal adjacent to Taing Kyo village and, further inland, Chaung Tha village in Thandwe district, Gwa township in Rakhine division. |
Sampling methods Analytical frameworks
Threats
Gibbons are mainly threatened by habitat loss due to logging (Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 Climate change & severe weather | 11.4 Storms & flooding | High (more than 70% of population affected) | A cyclone in 2005 caused a lot of destruction of the forest in the site (Geissmann et al. 2009). | 2005 |
| 2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | Present (unknown severity) | Cultivation of rice and other agricultural cash crops and subsistence crops encroaching the site due to lack of demarcation (Geissmann et al. 2009). | 2008-Ongoing (2023) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | Present (unknown severity) | Hunting targeting mainly wild pigs and red muntjacs, but other wildlife get trapped in snares (Geissmann et al. 2009). | 2008-Ongoing (2023) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.2 Gathering terrestrial plants | Present (unknown severity) | Extraction of NTFPs such as bamboo for construction and medicinal plants (Geissmann et al. 2009). | 2009-Ongoing (2023) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Timber extraction for income and fuelwood (Geissmann et al. 2009). | 2009-Ongoing (2023) |
Conservation activities
Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Category | Specific activity | Description | Implementing organization(s) | Year of activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Counter-wildlife crime | 2.3 Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols | Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division & Wildlife Conservation Society (Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023). | 2014-2020 | |
| 2 Counter-wildlife crime | 2.3 Conduct regular anti-poaching patrols | Biodiversity Fund, Rakhine Coastal Conservation Association & Community (Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023). | 2021-Ongoing (2023) | |
| 5 Protection & restoration | 5.2 Legally protect ape habitat | The site has been a protected area since 2002. | 2002-Ongoing (2023) |
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Resources and capacity | 2.3 General lack of funding | Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023 | |
| 4 Institutional support | 4.1 Lack of law enforcement | Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023 |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Site management | |||
| 2 Resources and capacity | |||
| 3 Engaged community | |||
| 4 Institutional support | |||
| 5 Ecological context | |||
| 6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
In addition to a 2008 gibbon and biodiversity survey and training in southern Rakhine Yoma by Myanmar Primate Conservation Program, BANCA, FFI, PRCF and Yangon University, a project for community hoolock gibbon monitoring and protection, funded by Arcus Gibbon Foundation, Myanmar Biodiversity Fund and Rakhine Coastal Conservation Association, is taking place between 2021 and 2024 (Naw May Lay Thant pers. obs. 2023).
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Rakhine Yoma Elephant Range
| Category | Behavior | Observation type | Prevalence | Observation dates | Source | Habituation | Species | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
External links
References
Geissmann, T., Grindley, M., Momberg, F., Lwin, N., & Moses, S. (2009). Hoolock gibbon and biodiversity survey and training in southern Rakhine Yoma, Myanmar. Gibbon Journal, (5), 7-27. link
Page created by: Naw May Lay Thant & APES Atlas Team Date: 2023-11-10