Jump to content

Haute Dodo Classified Forest: Difference between revisions

From The APES Atlas
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
* The forest is quite degraded, with several rubber tree plantations, and it is home to many gold miners which also infiltrate [[Taï Ntional Park]]
* The forest is quite degraded, with several rubber tree plantations, and it is home to many gold miners which also infiltrate [[Taï Ntional Park]]
* Conservation activities are unknown.
* Conservation activities are unknown.




Line 44: Line 41:


[[Types of sites]] [[Governance types]] [[Habitat types]]  
[[Types of sites]] [[Governance types]] [[Habitat types]]  
= Ape status =
= Ape status =


Current data on the population status of chimpanzees is lacking for the site, but it has been thought that the forest still holds a significant population (Kormos et al. 2003).
Current data on the population status of chimpanzees is lacking for the site, but it has been thought that the forest still holds a significant population ([[#R00747|Kormos et al. 2003]]).


'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Haute Dodo Classified Forest'''
'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Haute Dodo Classified Forest'''
Line 64: Line 62:
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|1988
|2002
|Present
|
|
|
|
|
|0.4
|400
|Haute Dodo Classified Forest
|Haute Dodo Classified Forest
|Unknown
|Unknown
|
|
|Hoppe-Dominik 1991
|[[#R00748|Sanderson et al. 2005]]
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2002
|1988
|Present
|
|
|
|
|
|0.4
|400.0
|Haute Dodo Classified Forest
|Haute Dodo Classified Forest
|Unknown
|Unknown
|
|
|Sanderson et al. 2005
|[[#R00746|Hoppe-Dominik 1991]]
|
|
|
|
Line 91: Line 89:


[[Sampling methods]] [[Analytical frameworks]]  
[[Sampling methods]] [[Analytical frameworks]]  
= Threats =
= Threats =


Line 117: Line 116:


[[Threats]]  
[[Threats]]  
= Conservation activities =
= Conservation activities =


Line 137: Line 137:


[[Conservation activities]]  
[[Conservation activities]]  
= Challenges =
= Challenges =






'''Table 5. Challenges reported for Haute Dodo Classified Forest'''
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" class="Challenges-table"
!Challenges
!Specific challenges
!Source
!Year(s)
|-
|
|
|
|
|}


[[Challenges]]
= Enablers =
= Enablers =






= Research activities =
= Research activities =






= Documented behaviours =
= Documented behaviours =




Line 169: Line 160:
= Exposure to climate change impacts =
= Exposure to climate change impacts =


As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. subm. extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.
As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, [[#R02212|Kiribou et al. (2024)]] extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.


The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (see Kiribou et al. subm. for details).
The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated ([[#R02212|Kiribou et al. 2024]]).


'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Haute Dodo Classified Forest'''
'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Haute Dodo Classified Forest'''
Line 285: Line 276:
|}
|}


<div><ul><li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:PrecipAnomaly_Haute_Dodo.png| 450px | thumb| none | Precipitation anomaly in Haute Dodo Classified Forest]] </li><li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:TempAnomaly_Haute_Dodo.png | 450px | thumb| none | Temperature anomaly in Haute Dodo Classified Forest]] </li></ul></div>


= External links =
= External links =
Line 292: Line 285:
= References =
= References =


Hoppe-Dominik, B. 1991. Distribution and status of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) on the Ivory coast. Primate Report, 31, 45–57 <br>
<span id="R00746"></span>Hoppe-Dominik, B. (1991). Distribution and status of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) on the Ivory Coast. Primate Report, 31, 45–57.
Kormos, R., Boesch, C., Bakarr, M.I. and Butynski, T. (eds.). (2003). West African Chimpanzees. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ix + 219 pp.<br>
 
Sanderson, J., Barrie, A., Coleman, J.E., et al. (2005). A rapid survey of mammals from the Haute Dodo and Cavally Forests, Côte d’Ivoire. In A Rapid Biological Assessment of Two Classified Forests in South-Western Côte d’Ivoire. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 34, ed. L. E. Alonso, F. Lauginie and G. Rondeau. Washington DC: Conservation International, pp. 118–24. <br>
<span id="R00747"></span>Kormos, R., Boesch, C., Bakarr, M. I., & Butynski, T. (Eds.). (2003). West African chimpanzees: Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. ix + 219 pp. [https://web.archive.org/web/20120514150708/http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2003-059.pdf link]
 
<span id="R00748"></span>Sanderson, J., Barrie, A., Coleman, J. E., et al. (2005). A rapid survey of mammals from the Haute Dodo and Cavally Forests, Côte d’Ivoire. In L. E. Alonso, F. Lauginie, & G. Rondeau (Eds.), A rapid biological assessment of two classified forests in south-western Côte d’Ivoire (RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 34, pp. 118–124). Conservation International, Washington, DC.
 
<span id="R02212"></span>Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. ''PLOS Climate'', 3(2), e0000345. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345 doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345]






'''Page created by: '''Serge Soiret''' Date:''' 2025-05-27
'''Page created by: '''Serge Soiret''' Date:''' 2025-05-27

Latest revision as of 17:53, 15 October 2026

West Africa > Côte d'Ivoire > Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu

Summary

Loading map...
  • West African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Haute Dodo Classified Forest.
  • Population size is unknown.
  • The population trend is unknown.
  • This site has a total surface area of 1,094 km².
  • The forest is quite degraded, with several rubber tree plantations, and it is home to many gold miners which also infiltrate Taï Ntional Park
  • Conservation activities are unknown.


Site characteristics

The Haute Dodo Classified Forest has been assigned Category 3 in terms of forest degradation (the most severe level) by OIPR. It is managed by SODEFOR. It lies between the towns of Grabo, Dogbo, Doba and Djouroutou, south from the Taï National Park.

Table 1. Basic site information for Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Species Pan troglodytes verus
Area 1,094 km²
Coordinates Lat: 4.954447 , Lon: -7.093513
Type of site Protected area (Classified Forest)
Habitat types Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest
Type of governance Governance by government

Types of sites Governance types Habitat types

Ape status

Current data on the population status of chimpanzees is lacking for the site, but it has been thought that the forest still holds a significant population (Kormos et al. 2003).

Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Species Year Occurrence Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) Abundance estimate (95% CI) Survey area Sampling method Analytical framework Source Comments A.P.E.S. database ID
Pan troglodytes verus 2002 Present Haute Dodo Classified Forest Unknown Sanderson et al. 2005
Pan troglodytes verus 1988 0.4 400.0 Haute Dodo Classified Forest Unknown Hoppe-Dominik 1991

Sampling methods Analytical frameworks

Threats

This classified forest is much degraded, with rubber tree fields. It is home to many gold miners. It is from this forest that the majority of gold miners leave to infiltrate the Taï National Park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025).

Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Category Specific threats Threat level Description Year of threat
2 Agriculture & aquaculture 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops Present (unknown severity) Rubber tree plantations present in the site (Soiret pers. comm. 2025). Ongoing (2025)
3 Energy production & mining 3.2 Mining & quarrying Present (unknown severity) Gold miners inhabit the site and move to Tai National Park from this site (Soiret pers. comm. 2025). Ongoing (2025)

Threats

Conservation activities

Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Category Specific activity Description Implementing organization(s) Year of activity
5 Protection & restoration 5.2 Legally protect ape habitat Ongoing (2025)

Conservation activities

Challenges

Enablers

Research activities

Documented behaviours

Exposure to climate change impacts

As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. (2024) extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.

The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (Kiribou et al. 2024).

Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Value 1981-2010 2021-2050, RCP 2.6 2021-2050, RCP 6.0 2071-2099, RCP 2.6 2071-2099, RCP 6.0
Mean temperature [C] 25.5 26.5 26.3 26.6 27.6
Annual precipitation [mm] 2094 2044 2139 2078 2147
Max no. consecutive dry days (per year) 13.3 17.2 15.9 16.3 17.8
No. days with heavy precipitation (per year) 6.2 8.8 10.2 9 12.7


Table 9. Projected exposure of apes to extreme climate impact events in Haute Dodo Classified Forest

Type No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 6.0)
Crop failure 5 1.96 5 1.45 5.5 1.83 8 1.82
Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heatwave 15 87.29 16.5 88.75 18.5 89.93 17 82.11
River flood 0.75 0.03 3 2.21 3 0.96 2.5 0.68
Tropical cyclone 0 0 0.5 1.21 0 0 0 0
Wildfire 30 0.25 30 0.22 29 0.27 29 0.26


  • Precipitation anomaly in Haute Dodo Classified Forest
  • Temperature anomaly in Haute Dodo Classified Forest

External links

References

Hoppe-Dominik, B. (1991). Distribution and status of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) on the Ivory Coast. Primate Report, 31, 45–57.

Kormos, R., Boesch, C., Bakarr, M. I., & Butynski, T. (Eds.). (2003). West African chimpanzees: Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. ix + 219 pp. link

Sanderson, J., Barrie, A., Coleman, J. E., et al. (2005). A rapid survey of mammals from the Haute Dodo and Cavally Forests, Côte d’Ivoire. In L. E. Alonso, F. Lauginie, & G. Rondeau (Eds.), A rapid biological assessment of two classified forests in south-western Côte d’Ivoire (RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment 34, pp. 118–124). Conservation International, Washington, DC.

Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. PLOS Climate, 3(2), e0000345. doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345


Page created by: Serge Soiret Date: 2025-05-27