Jump to content

Usala Forest: Difference between revisions

From The APES Atlas
Created page with "Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Usala Forest '''[https://apesatlas-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Usala_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Français]''' | '''[https://apesatlas-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Usala_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=pt&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp Português]''' | '''[https://apesatlas-iucnapesportal-org.translate.goog/index.php/Usala_Forest?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_t..."
 
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
* Important threats to great apes include illegal mining and the presence of armed groups.
* Important threats to great apes include illegal mining and the presence of armed groups.
* Conservation activities are not documented.
* Conservation activities are not documented.




= Site characteristics =
= Site characteristics =


Usala forest lies to the east of [[Maiko National Park]], in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It is among the most remote, intact, and inaccessible blocks of tropical rainforest remaining in Africa (Kümpel et al. 2015). The site is also important for the conservation of okapis (Kümpel et al. 2015).
Usala forest lies to the east of [[Maiko National Park]], in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It is among the most remote, intact, and inaccessible blocks of tropical rainforest remaining in Africa ([[#R01864|Kümpel et al. 2015]]). The site is also important for the conservation of okapis ([[#R01864|Kümpel et al. 2015]]).


'''Table 1. Basic site information for Usala Forest'''
'''Table 1. Basic site information for Usala Forest'''
Line 44: Line 41:


[[Types of sites]] [[Governance types]] [[Habitat types]]  
[[Types of sites]] [[Governance types]] [[Habitat types]]  
= Ape status =
= Ape status =


Survey results suggest that between 2007 and 2014, the gorilla population in Usala remained relatively stable (Nixon et al. 2015).
Survey results suggest that between 2007 and 2014, the gorilla population in Usala remained relatively stable ([[#R01865|Nixon et al. 2015]]).


'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Usala Forest'''
'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Usala Forest'''
Line 64: Line 62:
|-
|-
|''Gorilla beringei graueri''
|''Gorilla beringei graueri''
|2007
|2014
|Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|240-410
|Usala Forest (340 km²)​
|Usala Forest (850 km²)​
|Reconnaissance walk
|Reconnaissance walk
|
|
|Nixon et al. 2015
|[[#R01865|Nixon et al. 2015]]
|Assessment led by the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International. 34 nest sites and large gorilla groups were encountered. Abundance estimate is tentative. Survey effort: 240 km.
|Survey effort: 200 km. 28 nest sites were encountered.
|
|
|-
|-
|''Gorilla beringei graueri''
|''Gorilla beringei graueri''
|2014
|2007
|Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|Usala Forest (340 km²)​
|240-410
|Usala Forest (850 km²)​
|Reconnaissance walk
|Reconnaissance walk
|
|
|Nixon et al. 2015
|[[#R01865|Nixon et al. 2015]]
|Survey effort: 200 km. 28 nest sites were encountered.
|Assessment led by the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International. 34 nest sites and large gorilla groups were encountered. Abundance estimate is tentative. Survey effort: 240 km.
|
|
|}
|}


[[Sampling methods]] [[Analytical frameworks]]  
[[Sampling methods]] [[Analytical frameworks]]  
= Threats =
= Threats =


Line 106: Line 105:
|3.2 Mining & quarrying
|3.2 Mining & quarrying
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|Presence of armed groups involved in illegal mining activities (Kümpel et al. 2015).
|Presence of armed groups involved in illegal mining activities ([[#R01864|Kümpel et al. 2015]]).
|Ongoing (2015)
|Ongoing (2015)
|}
|}


[[Threats]]  
[[Threats]]  
= Conservation activities =
= Conservation activities =




Line 117: Line 118:
= Challenges =
= Challenges =


Widespread presence of armed groups and illegal mining operations present serious challenges for the implementation of conservation activities (Kümpel et al. 2015).
Widespread presence of armed groups and illegal mining operations present serious challenges for the implementation of conservation activities ([[#R01864|Kümpel et al. 2015]]).


'''Table 5. Challenges reported for Usala Forest'''
'''Table 5. Challenges reported for Usala Forest'''
Line 128: Line 129:
|6 Safety and stability
|6 Safety and stability
|6.3 Civil unrest/war
|6.3 Civil unrest/war
|Kümpel et al. 2015
|[[#R01864|Kümpel et al. 2015]]
|
|
|}
|}


[[Challenges]]  
[[Challenges]]  
= Enablers =
= Enablers =


Line 176: Line 178:


[[Enablers]]  
[[Enablers]]  
= Research activities =
= Research activities =


Nixon, S.C., Mufabule, K., Eliba, A. & Patule, I.M. 2007. A prospection survey of the Usala Forest and proposed Usala Community Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo. Unpublished report submitted to DFGI, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, Goma, DRC. Available at http://fondationkumu.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/usalaprospection-2007.pdf
Nixon, S.C., Mufabule, K., Eliba, A. & Patule, I.M. 2007. A prospection survey of the Usala Forest and proposed Usala Community Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo. Unpublished report submitted to DFGI, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, Goma, DRC. Available at http://fondationkumu.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/usalaprospection-2007.pdf


= Documented behaviours =
= Documented behaviours =
Line 208: Line 212:


[[Behaviours]]  
[[Behaviours]]  
= Exposure to climate change impacts =
= Exposure to climate change impacts =


As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. subm. extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.
As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, [[#R02335|Kiribou et al. (2024)]] extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.


The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (see Kiribou et al. subm. for details).
The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated ([[#R02335|Kiribou et al. 2024]]).


'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Usala Forest'''
'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Usala Forest'''
Line 247: Line 252:
|7.1
|7.1
|7.5
|7.5
|8.3000000000000007
|8.3
|8.1
|8.1
|11.8
|11.8
Line 323: Line 328:
|0.47
|0.47
|29
|29
|0.28000000000000003
|0.28
|}
|}


<div><ul><li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:PrecipAnomaly_Usala_Forest.png| 450px | thumb| none | Precipitation anomaly in Usala Forest]] </li><li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:TempAnomaly_Usala_Forest.png | 450px | thumb| none | Temperature anomaly in Usala Forest]] </li></ul></div>


= External links =
= External links =
Line 333: Line 340:
= References =
= References =


Nixon, S., Kaghoma, C. & Vyalengerera, M. (2015). The status of Grauer’s gorilla in the Usala Forest. Gorilla Journal (Journal of Berggorilla and Regenwald Direkthilfe) 50.
<span id="R01864"></span>Kümpel, N. F., Quinn, A., Queslin, E., Grange, S., Mallon, D. & Mapilanga, J-J. (2015). Okapi (Okapia johnstoni): Conservation Strategy and Status Review. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). pp. 58
 
<span id="R01865"></span>Nixon, S., Kaghoma, C. & Vyalengerera, M. (2015). The status of Grauer’s gorilla in the Usala Forest. Gorilla Journal (Journal of Berggorilla and Regenwald Direkthilfe) 50. [https://berggorilla.org/en/home/news-archive/article-view/the-status-of-grauers-gorilla-in-the-usala-forest link]


Kümpel, N. F., Quinn, A., Queslin, E., Grange, S., Mallon, D. & Mapilanga, J-J. (2015). Okapi (Okapia johnstoni): Conservation Strategy and Status Review. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). pp. 58
<span id="R02335"></span>Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. ''PLOS Climate'', 3(2), e0000345. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345 doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345]






'''Page created by: '''APES Atlas Team''' Date:''' 2020-12-29
'''Page created by: '''APES Atlas Team''' Date:''' 2020-12-29

Latest revision as of 17:55, 15 October 2026

Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Usala Forest

Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu

Summary

Loading map...
  • Eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) & Grauer's gorillas (Gorilla beringei graueri) are present in Usala Forest.
  • In 2007, the gorilla population was estimated to range between 240 to 410 individuals. The chimpanzee population is unknown.
  • The gorilla population trend is stable; the chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
  • The site has a total size of 3,500 km².
  • Important threats to great apes include illegal mining and the presence of armed groups.
  • Conservation activities are not documented.


Site characteristics

Usala forest lies to the east of Maiko National Park, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It is among the most remote, intact, and inaccessible blocks of tropical rainforest remaining in Africa (Kümpel et al. 2015). The site is also important for the conservation of okapis (Kümpel et al. 2015).

Table 1. Basic site information for Usala Forest

Species Gorilla beringei graueri
Area 3,500 km²
Coordinates Lat: -0.5275 , Lon: 28.2898
Type of site Non-protected area
Habitat types Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest
Type of governance

Types of sites Governance types Habitat types

Ape status

Survey results suggest that between 2007 and 2014, the gorilla population in Usala remained relatively stable (Nixon et al. 2015).

Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Usala Forest

Species Year Occurrence Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) Abundance estimate (95% CI) Survey area Sampling method Analytical framework Source Comments A.P.E.S. database ID
Gorilla beringei graueri 2014 Present Usala Forest (340 km²)​ Reconnaissance walk Nixon et al. 2015 Survey effort: 200 km. 28 nest sites were encountered.
Gorilla beringei graueri 2007 240-410 Usala Forest (850 km²)​ Reconnaissance walk Nixon et al. 2015 Assessment led by the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International. 34 nest sites and large gorilla groups were encountered. Abundance estimate is tentative. Survey effort: 240 km.

Sampling methods Analytical frameworks

Threats

Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Usala Forest

Category Specific threats Threat level Description Year of threat
3 Energy production & mining 3.2 Mining & quarrying High (more than 70% of population affected) Presence of armed groups involved in illegal mining activities (Kümpel et al. 2015). Ongoing (2015)

Threats

Conservation activities

Challenges

Widespread presence of armed groups and illegal mining operations present serious challenges for the implementation of conservation activities (Kümpel et al. 2015).

Table 5. Challenges reported for Usala Forest

Challenges Specific challenges Source Year(s)
6 Safety and stability 6.3 Civil unrest/war Kümpel et al. 2015

Challenges

Enablers

Table 6. Enablers reported for Usala Forest

Enablers Specific enablers Source Year(s)
1 Site management
2 Resources and capacity
3 Engaged community
4 Institutional support
5 Ecological context
6 Safety and stability

Enablers

Research activities

Nixon, S.C., Mufabule, K., Eliba, A. & Patule, I.M. 2007. A prospection survey of the Usala Forest and proposed Usala Community Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo. Unpublished report submitted to DFGI, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International, Goma, DRC. Available at http://fondationkumu.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/usalaprospection-2007.pdf


Documented behaviours

Table 7. Behaviours documented for Usala Forest

Category Behavior Observation type Prevalence Observation dates Source Habituation Species Comment
Not reported

Behaviours

Exposure to climate change impacts

As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. (2024) extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.

The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (Kiribou et al. 2024).

Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Usala Forest

Value 1981-2010 2021-2050, RCP 2.6 2021-2050, RCP 6.0 2071-2099, RCP 2.6 2071-2099, RCP 6.0
Mean temperature [C] 22.8 24 23.7 24.2 25.3
Annual precipitation [mm] 1648 1637 1699 1599 1729
Max no. consecutive dry days (per year) 5.8 11.4 12 15.5 13.1
No. days with heavy precipitation (per year) 7.1 7.5 8.3 8.1 11.8


Table 9. Projected exposure of apes to extreme climate impact events in Usala Forest

Type No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 6.0)
Crop failure 4 0 3.5 0 5 0 16.5 0
Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heatwave 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 100
River flood 2 1.04 2.75 2.04 1.75 1 5.5 2.4
Tropical cyclone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wildfire 30 0.39 30 0.38 29 0.47 29 0.28


  • Precipitation anomaly in Usala Forest
  • Temperature anomaly in Usala Forest

External links

References

Kümpel, N. F., Quinn, A., Queslin, E., Grange, S., Mallon, D. & Mapilanga, J-J. (2015). Okapi (Okapia johnstoni): Conservation Strategy and Status Review. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN). pp. 58

Nixon, S., Kaghoma, C. & Vyalengerera, M. (2015). The status of Grauer’s gorilla in the Usala Forest. Gorilla Journal (Journal of Berggorilla and Regenwald Direkthilfe) 50. link

Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. PLOS Climate, 3(2), e0000345. doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345


Page created by: APES Atlas Team Date: 2020-12-29