Ala Forest Reserve: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
= Ape status = | = Ape status = | ||
Chimpanzees are extinct or nearly extinct in Ala Forest Reserve. During a 2006 survey, no chimpanzees, nor signs of chimpanzees, were encountered (Greengrass 2006). | Chimpanzees are extinct or nearly extinct in Ala Forest Reserve. During a 2006 survey, no chimpanzees, nor signs of chimpanzees, were encountered ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]). | ||
'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Ala Forest Reserve''' | '''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Ala Forest Reserve''' | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
|Reconnaissance walk | |Reconnaissance walk | ||
| | | | ||
|Greengrass 2006 | |[[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
= Threats = | = Threats = | ||
The northern half of the reserve is dominated by teak, oil palm, and cocoa plantations (Greengrass 2006). In the southern half of the reserve, even though the forest seems to be in a better condition, logging pressure is very high and large mammals are very scarce (Greengrass 2006). | The northern half of the reserve is dominated by teak, oil palm, and cocoa plantations ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]). In the southern half of the reserve, even though the forest seems to be in a better condition, logging pressure is very high and large mammals are very scarce ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]). | ||
'''Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Ala Forest Reserve''' | '''Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Ala Forest Reserve''' | ||
| Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
|2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | |2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|Oil palm and cocoa plantations in the northern half of the reserve (Greengrass 2006) | |Oil palm and cocoa plantations in the northern half of the reserve ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]) | ||
|Ongoing (2006) | |Ongoing (2006) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
|2.2 Wood & pulp plantations | |2.2 Wood & pulp plantations | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|Land cleared for teak plantations (Greengrass 2006) | |Land cleared for teak plantations ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]) | ||
|Ongoing (2006) | |Ongoing (2006) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
|4.1 Roads & railroads | |4.1 Roads & railroads | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|A road crosses the reserve from north to south (Greengrass 2006) | |A road crosses the reserve from north to south ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]) | ||
|Ongoing (2006) | |Ongoing (2006) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | |5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|Hunter trails and a large number of discarded cartridges were found in the southern part of the reserve, where chimpanzees were last seen (Greengrass 2006) | |Hunter trails and a large number of discarded cartridges were found in the southern part of the reserve, where chimpanzees were last seen ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]) | ||
|Ongoing (2006) | |Ongoing (2006) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
|5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | |5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | ||
|High (more than 70% of population affected) | |High (more than 70% of population affected) | ||
|Logging pressure is high in the area were chimpanzees were last seen (Greengrass 2006) | |Logging pressure is high in the area were chimpanzees were last seen ([[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]]) | ||
|Ongoing (2006) | |Ongoing (2006) | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
|1 Site management | |1 Site management | ||
|1.3 Corruption | |1.3 Corruption | ||
|Greengrass 2006 | |[[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]] | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 Resources and capacity | |2 Resources and capacity | ||
|2.3 General lack of funding | |2.3 General lack of funding | ||
|Greengrass 2006 | |[[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]] | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4 Institutional support | |4 Institutional support | ||
|4.1 Lack of law enforcement | |4.1 Lack of law enforcement | ||
|Greengrass 2006 | |[[#R00010|Greengrass 2006]] | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
= Exposure to climate change impacts = | = Exposure to climate change impacts = | ||
As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. (2024) extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2°C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3°C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period. | As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, [[#R00011|Kiribou et al. (2024)]] extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2°C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3°C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period. | ||
The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (Kiribou et al. 2024). | The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated ([[#R00011|Kiribou et al. 2024]]). | ||
'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Ala Forest Reserve''' | '''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Ala Forest Reserve''' | ||
| Line 361: | Line 361: | ||
= References = | = References = | ||
Greengrass, E.J. (2006). A survey of chimpanzees in south-west Nigeria. Report to the NCF-WCS Biodiversity Research Programme. | <span id="R00010"></span>Greengrass, E. J. (2006). A survey of chimpanzees in south-west Nigeria. Report to the NCF-WCS Biodiversity Research Programme. [http://cameroun-foret.com/system/files/18_13_132.pdf link] | ||
Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., | <span id="R00011"></span>Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. ''PLOS Climate'', 3(2), e0000345. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345 doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345] | ||
'''Page created by: '''APES Atlas Team''' Date:''' 2020-11-19 | '''Page created by: '''APES Atlas Team''' Date:''' 2020-11-19 | ||
Latest revision as of 17:52, 15 October 2026
West Africa > Nigeria > Ala Forest Reserve
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Nigeria-Cameroon chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes ellioti) have been present in Ala Forest Reserve.
- Chimpanzees are extinct or nearly extinct at the site.
- The chimpanzee population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 199 km².
- Key threats to chimpanzees are hunting and logging for oil palm, cocoa, and teak plantations.
- Conservation activities not documented.
Site characteristics
Table 1. Basic site information for Ala Forest Reserve
| Species | Pan troglodytes ellioti |
| Area | 199 km² |
| Coordinates | Lat: 7.051510 , Lon: 5.436220 |
| Type of site | Protected area (Forest Reserve) |
| Habitat types | Agricultural land, Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest, Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest |
| Type of governance |
Types of sites Governance types Habitat types
Ape status
Chimpanzees are extinct or nearly extinct in Ala Forest Reserve. During a 2006 survey, no chimpanzees, nor signs of chimpanzees, were encountered (Greengrass 2006).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Ala Forest Reserve
| Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan troglodytes ellioti | 2006 | Absent | 0 | Ala Forest Reserve | Reconnaissance walk | Greengrass 2006 |
Sampling methods Analytical frameworks
Threats
The northern half of the reserve is dominated by teak, oil palm, and cocoa plantations (Greengrass 2006). In the southern half of the reserve, even though the forest seems to be in a better condition, logging pressure is very high and large mammals are very scarce (Greengrass 2006).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Ala Forest Reserve
| Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Oil palm and cocoa plantations in the northern half of the reserve (Greengrass 2006) | Ongoing (2006) |
| 2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.2 Wood & pulp plantations | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Land cleared for teak plantations (Greengrass 2006) | Ongoing (2006) |
| 4 Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | High (more than 70% of population affected) | A road crosses the reserve from north to south (Greengrass 2006) | Ongoing (2006) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Hunter trails and a large number of discarded cartridges were found in the southern part of the reserve, where chimpanzees were last seen (Greengrass 2006) | Ongoing (2006) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Logging pressure is high in the area were chimpanzees were last seen (Greengrass 2006) | Ongoing (2006) |
Conservation activities
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Ala Forest Reserve
| Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Site management | 1.3 Corruption | Greengrass 2006 | |
| 2 Resources and capacity | 2.3 General lack of funding | Greengrass 2006 | |
| 4 Institutional support | 4.1 Lack of law enforcement | Greengrass 2006 |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Ala Forest Reserve
| Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Site management | |||
| 2 Resources and capacity | |||
| 3 Engaged community | |||
| 4 Institutional support | |||
| 5 Ecological context | |||
| 6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
No information on research activities has been documented.
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Ala Forest Reserve
| Category | Behavior | Observation type | Prevalence | Observation dates | Source | Habituation | Species | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. (2024) extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2°C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3°C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.
The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (Kiribou et al. 2024).
Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Ala Forest Reserve
| Value | 1981-2010 | 2021-2050, RCP 2.6 | 2021-2050, RCP 6.0 | 2071-2099, RCP 2.6 | 2071-2099, RCP 6.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean temperature [°C] | 26.3 | 27.4 | 27.2 | 27.6 | 28.6 |
| Annual precipitation [mm] | 1679 | 1715 | 1732 | 1687 | 1757 |
| Max no. consecutive dry days (per year) | 36.7 | 43.1 | 42.5 | 42 | 44.4 |
| No. days with heavy precipitation (per year) | 6.2 | 9.1 | 9 | 9.4 | 10.4 |
Table 9. Projected exposure of apes to extreme climate impact events in Ala Forest Reserve
| Type | No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) | % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) | No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) | % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) | No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) | % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) | No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) | % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop failure | 2.5 | 2.56 | 2.5 | 2.74 | 1 | 2.95 | 4.5 | 2.95 |
| Drought | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heatwave | 6.5 | 100 | 7.5 | 100 | 5.5 | 100 | 7.5 | 100 |
| River flood | 1.5 | 0.57 | 1.5 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 3 | 1.87 |
| Tropical cyclone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wildfire | 30 | 0.47 | 30 | 0.47 | 29 | 0.47 | 29 | 0.46 |
-
Precipitation anomaly in Ala Forest Reserve -
Temperature anomaly in Ala Forest Reserve
External links
References
Greengrass, E. J. (2006). A survey of chimpanzees in south-west Nigeria. Report to the NCF-WCS Biodiversity Research Programme. link
Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. PLOS Climate, 3(2), e0000345. doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345
Page created by: APES Atlas Team Date: 2020-11-19