Jump to content

Mont Péko National Park: Difference between revisions

From The APES Atlas
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
* The main threats to chimpanzees are farming and hunting.
* The main threats to chimpanzees are farming and hunting.
* Awareness-raising and surveillance activities are carried out on site.
* Awareness-raising and surveillance activities are carried out on site.




Line 45: Line 42:


[[Types of sites]] [[Governance types]] [[Habitat types]]  
[[Types of sites]] [[Governance types]] [[Habitat types]]  
= Ape status =
= Ape status =


The absence of chimpanzees was reported in 2015, but in the last biomonitoring survey in 2025, they found signs of their presence in the site in degraded forest (OIPR 2025).
The absence of chimpanzees was reported in 2015, but in the last biomonitoring survey in 2025, they found signs of their presence in the site in degraded forest ([[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]).


'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Mont Péko National Park'''
'''Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Mont Péko National Park'''
Line 65: Line 63:
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2001
|2025
|
|0.1849
|
|
|
|
|1.6
|320
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Line transects
|Line transects & recces
|
|They calculate the Kilometric abundance Index (KAI) with indirect signs with Transect and Recce and combined the result
|Kormos et al. 2003
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|Estimate for weaned individuals.
|
|
|CIV0040
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2015
|2025
|Absent
|
|
|0.1747
|
|
|
|
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Unknown
|Line transects
|
|E. Normand, personal communication (2016) as cited by Arcus Fountation 2024
|
|
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|
|
|CIV0040
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2025
|2025
|
|
|0.1849
|0.0101
|
|
|
|
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Line transects & recces
|Reconnaissance walk
|They calculate the Kilometric abundance Index (KAI) with indirect signs with Transect and Recce and combined the result
|OIPR 2025
|
|
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|
|
|CIV0040
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2025
|2015
|Absent
|
|
|0.1747
|
|
|
|
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Line transects
|Unknown
|
|
|OIPR 2025
|E. Normand, personal communication (2016) as cited by Arcus Fountation 2024
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|''Pan troglodytes verus''
|2025
|2001
|
|0.0101
|
|
|
|
|1.6
|320.0
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Mont Péko National Park (340km²)
|Reconnaissance walk
|Line transects
|
|OIPR 2025
|
|
|Kormos et al. 2003
|Estimate for weaned individuals.
|
|
|}
|}


[[Sampling methods]] [[Analytical frameworks]]  
[[Sampling methods]] [[Analytical frameworks]]  
= Threats =
= Threats =


Line 146: Line 145:
|2.1.1 Shifting agriculture
|2.1.1 Shifting agriculture
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|High (more than 70% of population affected)
|Slash-and-burn farming is severely encroaching the park (Assui et al. 2022). They found 15 plantations and new clearings (OIPR 2025).
|Slash-and-burn farming is severely encroaching the park ([[#R01238|Assui et al. 2022]]). They found 15 plantations and new clearings ([[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]).
|2002-Ongoing (2025)
|2002-Ongoing (2025)
|-
|-
Line 152: Line 151:
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
|5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals
|Present (unknown severity)
|Present (unknown severity)
|Signs of poaching have been found throught the park (gunshots and shell casings; Assui et al. 2022). Between 2024 and 2025, they also heard gunshots and found shell casings, but less than reported by Assui et al. 2022 (OIPR, 2025).
|Signs of poaching have been found throught the park (gunshots and shell casings; [[#R01238|Assui et al. 2022]]). Between 2024 and 2025, they also heard gunshots and found shell casings, but less than reported by [[#R01238|Assui et al. 2022]] ([[#R01239|OIPR, 2025]]).


|2002-Ongoing (2025)
|2002-Ongoing (2025)
Line 159: Line 158:
|9.3 Agricultural & forestry effluents
|9.3 Agricultural & forestry effluents
|Present (unknown severity)
|Present (unknown severity)
|Environmental pollution through the use of pesticides (Assui et al. 2022).
|Environmental pollution through the use of pesticides ([[#R01238|Assui et al. 2022]]).
|Ongoing (2022)
|Ongoing (2022)
|}
|}


[[Threats]]  
[[Threats]]  
= Conservation activities =
= Conservation activities =


The forest is being restored by OIPR. Awareness-raising and surveillance activities are carried out in the site. These activities have the financial support of the ADB and the World Bank through the PIF project. A management plan for the park has been drawn up. Biomonitoring activities have been carried out since 2024, with the first transect data collection in the park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025, OIPR 2025).
The forest is being restored by OIPR. Awareness-raising and surveillance activities are carried out in the site. These activities have the financial support of the ADB and the World Bank through the PIF project. A management plan for the park has been drawn up. Biomonitoring activities have been carried out since 2024, with the first transect data collection in the park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025, [[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]).


'''Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Mont Péko National Park'''
'''Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Mont Péko National Park'''
Line 175: Line 175:
!Implementing organization(s)
!Implementing organization(s)
!Year of activity
!Year of activity
|-
|5 Protection & restoration
|5.2 Legally protect ape habitat
|
|
|1968-Ongoing (2025)
|-
|-
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2 Counter-wildlife crime
|2.11 Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g., SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of patrols
|2.11 Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g., SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of patrols
|Surveillance activities. Biomonitoring activities have been carried out since 2024, with the first transect data collection in the Park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025, OIPR 2025).
|Surveillance activities. Biomonitoring activities have been carried out since 2024, with the first transect data collection in the Park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025, [[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]).
|Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves (OIPR)
|Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves (OIPR)
|2024-Ongoing (2025)
|2024-Ongoing (2025)
Line 193: Line 187:
|
|
|Ongoing (2025)
|Ongoing (2025)
|-
|5 Protection & restoration
|5.2 Legally protect ape habitat
|
|
|1968-Ongoing (2026)
|-
|-
|5 Protection & restoration
|5 Protection & restoration
Line 202: Line 202:


[[Conservation activities]]  
[[Conservation activities]]  
= Challenges =
= Challenges =


Line 215: Line 216:
|2 Resources and capacity
|2 Resources and capacity
|2.1 Lack of capacity/training
|2.1 Lack of capacity/training
|OIPR 2025
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|Ongoing (2025)
|Ongoing (2025)
|-
|-
|2 Resources and capacity
|2 Resources and capacity
|2.3 Continuous/long-term funding
|2.3 Continuous/long-term funding
|OIPR 2025
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|Ongoing (2025)
|Ongoing (2025)
|-
|-
|2 Resources and capacity
|2 Resources and capacity
|2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation
|2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation
|OIPR 2025
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|Ongoing (2025)
|Ongoing (2025)
|-
|-
|2 Resources and capacity
|2 Resources and capacity
|2.6 Lack of biomonitoring/survey data
|2.6 Lack of biomonitoring/survey data
|OIPR 2025
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|Ongoing (2025)
|Ongoing (2025)
|-
|-
|5 Ecological context
|5 Ecological context
|5.1 Ecological constraints (e.g., susceptibility to climate change, difficult terrain)
|5.1 Ecological constraints (e.g., susceptibility to climate change, difficult terrain)
|OIPR 2025
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|Ongoing (2025)
|Ongoing (2025)
|}
|}


[[Challenges]]  
[[Challenges]]  
= Enablers =
= Enablers =


Line 253: Line 255:
|4 Institutional support
|4 Institutional support
|4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement
|4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement
|OIPR 2025
|[[#R01239|OIPR 2025]]
|2018-Ongoing (2025)
|2018-Ongoing (2025)
|}
|}


[[Enablers]]  
[[Enablers]]  
= Research activities =
= Research activities =






= Documented behaviours =
= Documented behaviours =




Line 268: Line 273:
= Exposure to climate change impacts =
= Exposure to climate change impacts =


As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. subm. extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.
As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, [[#R02268|Kiribou et al. (2024)]] extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.


The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (see Kiribou et al. subm. for details).
The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated ([[#R02268|Kiribou et al. 2024]]).


'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Mont Péko National Park'''
'''Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Mont Péko National Park'''
Line 384: Line 389:
|}
|}


<div><ul><li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:PrecipAnomaly_Mont_Peko_NP.png| 450px | thumb| none | Precipitation anomaly in Mont Péko National Park]] </li><li style="display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;"> [[File:TempAnomaly_Mont_Peko_NP.png | 450px | thumb| none | Temperature anomaly in Mont Péko National Park]] </li></ul></div>


= External links =
= External links =
Line 391: Line 398:
= References =
= References =


Arcus Foundation. (2024). State of the Apes: Abundance annex (Vol. 5). Arcus Foundation. https://www.stateoftheapes.com/ <br>
<span id="R01237"></span>Arcus Foundation. (2024). State of the Apes: Abundance annex (Vol. 5). Arcus Foundation. https://www.stateoftheapes.com/
Assui Wa Kassi N’Guessan Dawy, Kouakou, Y. C., Bamba, K., N’Guessan, K. A., Koffi Djaha, A., Kouakou, C.-V., & Bene, J.-C. K. (2022). État de conservation des moyens et grands mammifères du Parc national du Mont Péko en période post crises socio-politiques dans l’ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire [Conservation status of medium-sized and large mammals at Mont Péko National Park in the post socio-political crisis period in western Côte d’Ivoire]. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 61(1), 50–63. http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/ <br>
 
OIPR. (2025) Rapport de la phase pilote 2024 de suivi-écologique au Parc national du Mont Péko. <br>
<span id="R01238"></span>Assui Wa Kassi N’Guessan Dawy, Kouakou, Y. C., Bamba, K., N’Guessan, K. A., Koffi Djaha, A., Kouakou, C.-V., & Bene, J.-C. K. (2022). État de conservation des moyens et grands mammifères du Parc national du Mont Péko en période post crises socio-politiques dans l’ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire [Conservation status of medium-sized and large mammals at Mont Péko National Park in the post socio-political crisis period in western Côte d’Ivoire]. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 61(1), 50–63. http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/ [https://web.archive.org/web/20260829140119/https://ijisr.issr-journals.org/ link]
 
<span id="R01239"></span>OIPR. (2025). Rapport de la phase pilote 2024 de suivi-écologique au Parc national du Mont Péko.


<span id="R02268"></span>Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. ''PLOS Climate'', 3(2), e0000345. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345 doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345]




Latest revision as of 17:54, 15 October 2026

West Africa > Côte d'Ivoire > Mont Péko National Park

Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu

Summary

Loading map...
  • West African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) are present in Mont Péko National Park.
  • This site has a total surface area of 340 km².
  • The main threats to chimpanzees are farming and hunting.
  • Awareness-raising and surveillance activities are carried out on site.



Site characteristics

The park is located to the west, betweenin the Bangolo and Duékoué departments. The park is under the authority of the Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves (OIPR). OIPR has set up a wildlife inventory system, with the presence of chimpanzees confirmed. For the moment, the number of chimpanzees is still unknown, pending a report on the chimpanzee population in the area (Soiret pers. comm. 2025).

Table 1. Basic site information for Mont Péko National Park

Species Pan troglodytes verus
Area 340 km²
Coordinates Lat: 7.010004 , Lon: -7.251357
Type of site Protected area (National Park)
Habitat types Subtropical/​tropical moist lowland forest, Subtropical/tropical moist montane forest, Subtropical/tropical heavily degraded former forest, Agricultural land
Type of governance Governance by government

Types of sites Governance types Habitat types

Ape status

The absence of chimpanzees was reported in 2015, but in the last biomonitoring survey in 2025, they found signs of their presence in the site in degraded forest (OIPR 2025).

Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Mont Péko National Park

Species Year Occurrence Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) Abundance estimate (95% CI) Survey area Sampling method Analytical framework Source Comments A.P.E.S. database ID
Pan troglodytes verus 2025 0.1849 Mont Péko National Park (340km²) Line transects & recces They calculate the Kilometric abundance Index (KAI) with indirect signs with Transect and Recce and combined the result OIPR 2025 CIV0040
Pan troglodytes verus 2025 0.1747 Mont Péko National Park (340km²) Line transects OIPR 2025 CIV0040
Pan troglodytes verus 2025 0.0101 Mont Péko National Park (340km²) Reconnaissance walk OIPR 2025 CIV0040
Pan troglodytes verus 2015 Absent Mont Péko National Park (340km²) Unknown E. Normand, personal communication (2016) as cited by Arcus Fountation 2024
Pan troglodytes verus 2001 1.6 320.0 Mont Péko National Park (340km²) Line transects Kormos et al. 2003 Estimate for weaned individuals.

Sampling methods Analytical frameworks

Threats

From 2002 to 2011, Côte d’Ivoire faced a political-military crisis that resulted in the removal of park management teams and widespread illegal encroachment on its territory. This led to considerable deforestation and fragmentation of ecosystems, endangering the site's ecological integrity.

Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Mont Péko National Park

Category Specific threats Threat level Description Year of threat
2 Agriculture & aquaculture 2.1.1 Shifting agriculture High (more than 70% of population affected) Slash-and-burn farming is severely encroaching the park (Assui et al. 2022). They found 15 plantations and new clearings (OIPR 2025). 2002-Ongoing (2025)
5 Biological resource use 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals Present (unknown severity) Signs of poaching have been found throught the park (gunshots and shell casings; Assui et al. 2022). Between 2024 and 2025, they also heard gunshots and found shell casings, but less than reported by Assui et al. 2022 (OIPR, 2025). 2002-Ongoing (2025)
9 Pollution 9.3 Agricultural & forestry effluents Present (unknown severity) Environmental pollution through the use of pesticides (Assui et al. 2022). Ongoing (2022)

Threats

Conservation activities

The forest is being restored by OIPR. Awareness-raising and surveillance activities are carried out in the site. These activities have the financial support of the ADB and the World Bank through the PIF project. A management plan for the park has been drawn up. Biomonitoring activities have been carried out since 2024, with the first transect data collection in the park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025, OIPR 2025).

Table 4. Conservation activities reported for Mont Péko National Park

Category Specific activity Description Implementing organization(s) Year of activity
2 Counter-wildlife crime 2.11 Implement monitoring surveillance strategies (e.g., SMART) or use monitoring data to improve effectiveness of patrols Surveillance activities. Biomonitoring activities have been carried out since 2024, with the first transect data collection in the Park (Soiret pers. comm. 2025, OIPR 2025). Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves (OIPR) 2024-Ongoing (2025)
4 Education & awareness 4.1 Educate local communities about apes and sustainable use Awareness raising activities (Soiret pers. comm. 2025). Ongoing (2025)
5 Protection & restoration 5.2 Legally protect ape habitat 1968-Ongoing (2026)
5 Protection & restoration 5.6 Habitat restoration The forest is being restored by OIPR (Soiret pers. comm. 2025). Ongoing (2025)

Conservation activities

Challenges

Table 5. Challenges reported for Mont Péko National Park

Challenges Specific challenges Source Year(s)
2 Resources and capacity 2.1 Lack of capacity/training OIPR 2025 Ongoing (2025)
2 Resources and capacity 2.3 Continuous/long-term funding OIPR 2025 Ongoing (2025)
2 Resources and capacity 2.5 Lack of equipment/transportation OIPR 2025 Ongoing (2025)
2 Resources and capacity 2.6 Lack of biomonitoring/survey data OIPR 2025 Ongoing (2025)
5 Ecological context 5.1 Ecological constraints (e.g., susceptibility to climate change, difficult terrain) OIPR 2025 Ongoing (2025)

Challenges

Enablers

Table 6. Enablers reported for Mont Péko National Park

Enablers Specific enablers Source Year(s)
4 Institutional support 4.1 Effective legislation and law enforcement OIPR 2025 2018-Ongoing (2025)

Enablers

Research activities

Documented behaviours

Exposure to climate change impacts

As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. (2024) extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.

The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (Kiribou et al. 2024).

Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Mont Péko National Park

Value 1981-2010 2021-2050, RCP 2.6 2021-2050, RCP 6.0 2071-2099, RCP 2.6 2071-2099, RCP 6.0
Mean temperature [C] 25.4 26.6 26.5 26.6 27.8
Annual precipitation [mm] 1587 1593 1653 1608 1702
Max no. consecutive dry days (per year) 37.1 33.2 34.5 34.7 34.2
No. days with heavy precipitation (per year) 5.8 5.7 6 5.9 8.4


Table 9. Projected exposure of apes to extreme climate impact events in Mont Péko National Park

Type No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 6.0)
Crop failure 2 2.18 2 1.95 2 2.18 4.5 2.18
Drought 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heatwave 5 100 3 100 3.5 100 7.5 100
River flood 1 0.29 2 1.98 1.75 2.01 5 2.59
Tropical cyclone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wildfire 30 0.53 30 0.53 29 0.52 29 0.55


  • Precipitation anomaly in Mont Péko National Park
  • Temperature anomaly in Mont Péko National Park

External links

References

Arcus Foundation. (2024). State of the Apes: Abundance annex (Vol. 5). Arcus Foundation. https://www.stateoftheapes.com/

Assui Wa Kassi N’Guessan Dawy, Kouakou, Y. C., Bamba, K., N’Guessan, K. A., Koffi Djaha, A., Kouakou, C.-V., & Bene, J.-C. K. (2022). État de conservation des moyens et grands mammifères du Parc national du Mont Péko en période post crises socio-politiques dans l’ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire [Conservation status of medium-sized and large mammals at Mont Péko National Park in the post socio-political crisis period in western Côte d’Ivoire]. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 61(1), 50–63. http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/ link

OIPR. (2025). Rapport de la phase pilote 2024 de suivi-écologique au Parc national du Mont Péko.

Kiribou, R., Tehoda, P., Chukwu, O., Bempah, G., Kühl, H. S., Ferreira, J., …, & Heinicke, S. (2024). Exposure of African ape sites to climate change impacts. PLOS Climate, 3(2), e0000345. doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000345


Page created by: Serge Soiret Date: 2025-05-27

Page updated by: Diorne Zausa Date: 2025-10-08

Retrieved from "https://apesatlas.iucnapesportal.org/index.php?title=Mont_Péko_National_Park&oldid=4573"