Lac Tumba landscape
Central Africa > Democratic Republic of the Congo > Lac Tumba landscape
Français | Português | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | Melayu
Summary
- Bonobos (Pan paniscus) and eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) are present in the Lac Tumba landscape.
- The population sizes are unknown.
- The great ape population trend is unknown.
- The site has a total size of 78,972 km².
- Key threats to bonobos are poaching, habitat loss, and diseases.
- Conservation activities are not documented.
- The site holds the world’s largest swamp forest, and the world’s second largest wetland area.
Site characteristics
The Lac Tumba (or Lake Tumba) landscape is situated in western Democratic Republic of Congo, and extends into neighbouring Republic of Congo, forming the Lac Tumba-Lac Tele transboundary landscape. The landscape is made up mainly of marshes, seasonally flooded forests and meadows. It is home to the largest Ramsar freshwater wetland of international importance. The forest of Lac Tumba is the world’s largest swamp forest, and the world’s second largest wetland area (WWF n.d.). About 60% of the Lac Tumba landscape is inundated and seasonally flooded forest (Inogwabini et al. 2007). The landscape is home to a wide variety of large mammals, including bonobos, chimpanzees, Angolan pied colobus, Allen's swamp monkeys, black mangabeys, red colobus, red-tailed monkeys, forest elephants, buffalos and leopards (Inogwabini et al. 2007). In addition, the swamps have a rich diversity of fish and attract freshwater-dependent species such as sitatunga, water chevrotain, slender-snout crocodiles, Nile crocodile, and hippopotamus (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 1. Basic site information for Lac Tumba landscape
| Species | Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii |
| Area | 78,972 km² |
| Coordinates | Lat: -1.597554 , Lon: 17.117188 |
| Type of site | Protected landscape |
| Habitat types | Subtropical/tropical swamp forest, Subtropical/tropical moist lowland forest, Savanna |
| Type of governance |
Types of sites Governance types Habitat types
Ape status
Bonobo groups were found in five areas in a 2005 survey: (1) Bolombo-Losombo, (2) Mbala-Donkese, (3) Ngombe-Botuali, (4) Botuali-Ilombe, and (5) Mompulenge–Mbanzi-Malebo–Nguomi (Inogwabini et al. 2007). There were two sub-groups in the latter area, separated by 50 km of unbroken gallery forest, Mopulenge-Mbanzi and Malebo-Nguomi. One group of chimpanzees was found in the area between Bosobele and Lubengo (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 2. Ape population estimates reported for Lac Tumba landscape
| Species | Year | Occurrence | Encounter or vistation rate (nests/km; ind/day) | Density estimate [ind./ km²] (95% CI) | Abundance estimate (95% CI) | Survey area | Sampling method | Analytical framework | Source | Comments | A.P.E.S. database ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan paniscus | 2005 | 0.057 | Bolombo-Losombo (552 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||||||
| Pan paniscus | 2005 | 0.27 (0.24-0.29) | 17 (15-19) | Mbala-Donkese (160 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||||
| Pan paniscus | 2005 | 0.27 (0.24-0.29) | 198 (176-212) | Ngombe-Botuali (1,829 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||||
| Pan paniscus | 2005 | 0.27 (0.24-0.29) | 103 (92-111) | Botuali-Ilombe (955 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||||
| Pan paniscus | 2005 | 2.2 (1.8-3.4) | 2,297 (1,880-3,550) | Malebo-Nguomi (1,993 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | |||||
| Pan paniscus | 2005 | 1.2 | Mopulenge-Mbanzi (1,380,390 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 | ||||||
| Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii | 2005 | 0.019 | Bosobele-Lubengo (4,047 km²) | Line transects & recces | Inogwabini et al. 2007 |
Sampling methods Analytical frameworks
Threats
Poaching, habitat loss, and diseases are the main direct threats to bonobos in Lac Tumba (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Although logging has been considered moderately severe, the situation is considered reversible if sufficient efforts are made, such as closing of logging roads and rehabilitation of the natural vegetation (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Unmonitored fishing and bushmeat hunting are common at the site (Inogwabini et al. 2007). The Bateke people inhabiting the Malebo area believe that bonobos are their ancestors, and therefore a traditional taboo prevents them from hunting bonobos (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Table 3. Threats to apes reported for Lac Tumba landscape
| Category | Specific threats | Threat level | Description | Year of threat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Agriculture & aquaculture | 2.1 Annual & perennial non-timber crops | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Unplanned and unsustainable subsistence agricultural practices (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | Ongoing (2007) |
| 4 Transportation & service corridors | 4.1 Roads & railroads | Low (up to 30% of population affected) | Development of communications infrastructure (roads, railways) (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.1 Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Poaching is facilitated by increasing availability of weapons and ammunition and the location of the area at the junction of major river routes (Inogwabini et al. 2007, IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
| 5 Biological resource use | 5.3 Logging & wood harvesting | High (more than 70% of population affected) | Legal and illegal industrial logging. Easy river access is used for transportation of timber to Kinshasa (IUCN & ICCN 2012). Logging for the wenge Mellitia laurenti (Inogwabini et al. 2007). | Ongoing (2012) |
| 8 Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases | 8.4 Pathogens | Present (unknown severity) | Threat of disease (IUCN & ICCN 2012). | Ongoing (2012) |
Conservation activities
The landscape is a priority conservation landscape funded by the Central African Regional Programme for the Environment of the US Agency for International Development through the International Congo Basin Forest Partnership. The site was selected as a priority conservation site in 2000 (Inogwabini et al. 2007).
Challenges
Table 5. Challenges reported for Lac Tumba landscape
| Challenges | Specific challenges | Source | Year(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Institutional support | 4.1 Lack of law enforcement | IUCN & ICCN 2012 | |
| 4 Institutional support | 4.2 Lack of government support | IUCN & ICCN 2012 | |
| 3 Engaged community | 3.1 General lack of community engagement or support | IUCN & ICCN 2012 | |
| Other (Insufficient subsistence alternatives) | IUCN & ICCN 2012 |
Enablers
Table 6. Enablers reported for Lac Tumba landscape
| Enablers | Specific enablers | Source | Year(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Site management | |||
| 2 Resources and capacity | |||
| 3 Engaged community | |||
| 4 Institutional support | |||
| 5 Ecological context | |||
| 6 Safety and stability |
Research activities
Documented behaviours
Table 7. Behaviours documented for Lac Tumba landscape
| Category | Behavior | Observation type | Prevalence | Observation dates | Source | Habituation | Species | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not reported |
Exposure to climate change impacts
As part of a study on the exposure of African great ape sites to climate change impacts, Kiribou et al. subm. extracted climate data and data on projected extreme climate impact events for the site. Climatological characteristics were derived from observation-based climate data provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP, www.isimip.org). Parameters were calculated as the average across each 30-year period. For 1981-2010, the EWEMBI dataset from ISIMIP2a was used. For the two future periods (2021-2050 and 2071-2099) ISIMIP2b climate data based on four CMIP5 global climate models were used. For future projections, two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) were used. RCP 2.6 is a scenario with strong mitigation measures in which global temperatures would likely rise below 2C. RCP 6.0 is a scenario with medium emissions in which global temperatures would likely rise up to 3C by 2100. For the number of days with heavy precipitation events, the 98th percentile of all precipitation days (>1mm/d) was calculated for the 1979-2013 reference period as a threshold for a heavy precipitation event. Then, for each year, the number of days above that threshold was derived. The figures on temperature and precipitation anomaly show the deviation from the mean temperature and mean precipitation for the 1979-2013 reference period.
The estimated exposure to future extreme climate impact events (crop failure, drought, river flood, wildfire, tropical cyclone, and heatwave) is based on a published dataset by Lange et al. 2020 derived from ISIMIP2b data. The same global climate models and RCPs as described above were used. Within each 30-year period, the number of years with an extreme event and the average proportion of the site affected were calculated (see Kiribou et al. subm. for details).
Table 8. Estimated past and projected climatological characteristics in Lac Tumba landscape
| Value | 1981-2010 | 2021-2050, RCP 2.6 | 2021-2050, RCP 6.0 | 2071-2099, RCP 2.6 | 2071-2099, RCP 6.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean temperature [C] | 25.9 | 27.1 | 27 | 27.4 | 28.3 |
| Annual precipitation [mm] | 1497 | 1511 | 1518 | 1543 | 1534 |
| Max no. consecutive dry days (per year) | 13.8 | 15.6 | 14.3 | 16.6 | 14.6 |
| No. days with heavy precipitation (per year) | 7.1 | 10.8 | 10.1 | 10.3 | 11.2 |
Table 9. Projected exposure of apes to extreme climate impact events in Lac Tumba landscape
| Type | No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) | % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 2.6) | No. of years with event (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) | % of site exposed (2021-2050, RCP 6.0) | No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) | % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 2.6) | No. of years with event (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) | % of site exposed (2070-2099, RCP 6.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crop failure | 10 | 0.01 | 6 | 0.01 | 7.5 | 0.02 | 25.5 | 0.02 |
| Drought | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heatwave | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 | 9.5 | 100 | 17.5 | 100 |
| River flood | 0.25 | 0.04 | 1.5 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0 | 2.5 | 0.41 |
| Tropical cyclone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wildfire | 30 | 0.79 | 30 | 0.79 | 29 | 0.76 | 29 | 0.65 |
External links
References
WWF (n.d.). Lac Tumba. Online: https://www.wwfdrc.org/en/our_work/landscapes/lac_tumba_landscape/
Inogwabini, B. I., Matungila, B., Mbende, L., Abokome, M., & wa Tshimanga, T. (2007). Great apes in the Lake Tumba landscape, Democratic Republic of Congo: newly described populations. Oryx, 41(4), 532-538.
IUCN & ICCN (2012). Bonobo (Pan paniscus): Conservation Strategy 2012–2022. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Primate
Spécialist Group & Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature. 65 pp
Page created by: APES Atlas Team Date: 2021-11-29